INTRODUCING VERSION 9 / CONNECTED RESEARCH EDITION
One research question. A connected body of evidence.
Plan the study in LingoScholar. Investigate the model in LignoScope. Bring exact numerical evidence, open questions and the next decisions into a campaign you can review and share deliberately.
Private academic studies · Public demo · Full program approval
THE CONNECTED RESEARCH CAMPAIGN V9
01
ProtocolWhat is the question, and how will it be assessed?
02
Model studyWhich actual calculations test the declared alternatives?
03
EvidenceWhich exact inputs and results support the comparison?
04
Next actionWhat measurement, decision or resource is still needed?
05
ReviewWhat should a supervisor or collaborator inspect?
Illustrative workflow / no experimental values shown
SEVEN CONNECTED CAPABILITIES
From separate tools to a complete campaign.
V9 connects the two workspaces through explicit evidence packages and a focused Campaign Desk. Your existing numerical methods, private projects and earlier research tools remain available.
01
Plan
Frozen Study Protocols
Retain the research question, hypotheses, response definitions and planned decisions before comparing your results.
Working scope and limits
A frozen baseline shows later changes to your declared protocol. It records a research plan; it does not establish that outcomes were unseen or independently preregister the study.
Run complete two- or three-factor forward studies in LignoScope and inspect main and pair interaction effects.
Working scope and limits
The selected factor combinations call the existing numerical model. Reported effects depend on the declared factors and levels. Failed runs remain visible; numerical effects do not establish a physical cause or experimental agreement.
Bring selected LignoScope inputs, results, sources and limitations into a LingoScholar campaign through a checked data package.
Working scope and limits
Passports retain exact evidence and integrity fingerprints. Import is explicit. File consistency does not authenticate an author, independently rerun the solver or establish experimental validity.
Inspect compatible retained response curves and scalar differences, then export clear vector figures.
Working scope and limits
Units, specimen and response definitions remain part of the comparison. Incompatible records stay separate, and a visual overlay does not establish model validation.
Turn unresolved evidence questions into research actions, milestones and a budget you can inspect.
Working scope and limits
Tasks, dates and costs are researcher-entered planning records. Missing measurements and unresolved assumptions remain explicit. The board does not estimate funding eligibility or promise support.
Keep feedback attached to the exact run it concerns and prepare a frozen private handoff to the existing Reviewer Workspace.
Working scope and limits
Online review uses the existing named-account invitation and acceptance process. Exported local feedback retains its declared identity and exact evidence target; it does not imply supervisor approval.
Prepare a portable account of the question, evidence, remaining work, requested decisions and declared support needs.
Working scope and limits
The brief uses retained results and authored statements. It preserves scientific limitations and unresolved questions. Exporting a package does not send it to a supervisor or funding organization.
V8 research defence, V7 connected evidence and the earlier analysis tools retain their own study formats. Use the Campaign Desk to organize a connected study without overwriting its source records.